« Panthers expect to reach deal with Lewis | Main | Morgan should make wise, healthy decision »

February 11, 2008

More from Delhomme interview

Delhommeforblog     In talking with Panthers quarterback Jake Delhomme about his rehabilitation from Tommy John surgery on his right elbow last week, we touched upon a number of other subjects as well.

    Delhomme is good friends with both Eli and Peyton Manning, the back-to-back Super Bowl MVPs. He’s been a counselor at Peyton’s offseason quarterback camp, and was particularly happy to see Eli lead the Giants to their remarkable Super Bowl win last Sunday.

    “I was extremely excited for Eli, and I thought what the Giants’ defensive line did in putting pressure on Brady was unbelievable,” Delhomme said.

    While amazed at New York receiver David Tyree’s late reception on the Giants’ winning touchdown drive, Delhomme wasn’t all that surprised.

    “I was with David at the (2006) Pro Bowl when he had made it as a special teams’ player,” he said. “Coach (John) Fox wanted to use everybody in practice and he some receiver for us, and did an outstanding job. You could tell then that he could play.”

• Delhomme thinks the Panthers, listed as 45-1 longshots to reach the Super Bowl by some prognosticators, aren’t far from competing at a high level.

• You can’t talk to him without bringing up horses; his family owns a number of thoroughbreds back home in Breaux Bridge, La. But he doesn’t muck stalls anymore (“no sense risking injury,” he said last year), and the Kentucky Derby is on the back burner.

    “We’ve got some good two-year-olds,” he said, chuckling. “But that’s not my priority right now; football is. That’s for later (in retirement).”

—Stan Olson

   

Posted by Observer Sports on February 11, 2008 at 11:32 AM | Permalink

Comments

You should ask him how he feels about the development (or lack thereof) of Keary Colbert and Drew Carter. I would love to hear his response.

Posted by: Token | Feb 11, 2008 2:50:04 PM

Panthers cut Wahle and Morgan

http://community.heraldonline.com/two_cuts_in

Posted by: This just in | Feb 11, 2008 4:16:54 PM

Token, you know very well what he would say about that. Jake never ever rips a teammate...

Posted by: stan olson | Feb 11, 2008 6:06:26 PM

This season proved just how much this team rellies on Delhomme. He is a great leader who inspires his teammates to do their best. He is also a very talented quarterback. I hope that there won't be so many Delhomme "haters" now that the team has seen how important he is! I'm estatic that Jake is back.

Posted by: Matt West | Feb 11, 2008 9:44:29 PM

Tampa XLIII Champs!

Posted by: Panther Fan D | Feb 12, 2008 12:03:58 AM

Jake only plays hard and at a high level when his job is in danger and i don't the panthers need a player like that they should cut him too and either start matt moore or get a new one

Posted by: Nathan Curtis | Feb 12, 2008 8:34:34 PM

Yeah, because his job has been in a whole lot of danger the last few years with the incredible backups we've had at the position.
Jake Delhomme: 16th ALL-TIME in passer rating. Dumbass.

Posted by: Michael Procton | Feb 12, 2008 8:56:06 PM

ok procton since ur so big on stats what about his picks and all the games he has lost bc of them including the nfc championship game aginst the seahawks and thats my point we havn't had a back up and if not for moose and steve smith he wld have been cut along time ago

Posted by: Nathan Curtis | Feb 12, 2008 9:20:35 PM

Nathan Curtis - After the last 2 years, you still have the guts to make this kind of statement. Without Jake, we are at best 7-9.. Jake alone will win 2 to 3 games. That makes the Panthers 9-7 (Playoff's this year with that record). or 10-6 division champs. Nathan Curtis - try looking at the Offensive Line, if you want to point out a defect. No QB could succeed with those players. 2003 we were lucky to have average Offensive Lineman, but great RB, QB, WR's (Smith & Moose)..

Posted by: Catsnmbr1fan | Feb 12, 2008 10:49:37 PM

We didn't lose the NFC Championship in '05 because of Delhomme. We lost it because we were down to our FOURTH-STRING running back.

Posted by: Michael Procton | Feb 13, 2008 2:53:04 PM

Post a comment






Advertisements

 
About Charlotte.com | About the Real Cities Network | Terms of Use & Privacy Statement | About Knight Ridder | Copyright