« Monday mid-day injury report | Main | Tuesday's Panthers-Saints links »

October 13, 2008

Fox Q&A

Here's the transcript from coach John Fox's Monday news conference following the Panthers' 27-3 loss against the Bucs:

Q. Why did Jake play so poorly?

Some of it's protection, some of it's supporting cast. In a nutshell, we just didn't execute very well offensively. Overall, whether it's the run game, passing game, a lot of things we deem being important going into that game because they have a very good defense. It can be any of those.

Q. Was it out of character for him?

I don't know about out of character.He or we didn't perform well offensively as we have. if you want to say that's out of character, you can.

Q. Is there any common problem in the three blocked punts this season?

The most common thing is we've had changes in games, personnel wise. That never makes anything easy, that's not an excuse. But some of our problems offensively were because we didn't have two starters in the game. Things in the game get influenced by injuries. Two of those punt blocks, I'd say not. One was at the start of the game, then the dropped (snap). Even the other day was the first punt, so I don't think that had a whole lot to do with it. But they do during the week in preparation and they have caused some changes as far as personnel goes during games. That changes who you're next to and those types of things.

Q. How do you treat a bad game like Sunday -- whether you should learn from it or not make too much of it?

The message doesnt' change very much from my perspective. When we win, it's pretty much X, and when we lose it's pretty much X. The sky' s not falling and it's not the end of the world. In this league they don't keep style points. Whether it's four or 40, it's still a loss. I don't think anybody in that locker room was pleased with the way we performed yesterday. It's not much of a different feeling than it was against Minnesota. We've played well enough to win four of them and not in the other two.

Q. Muhsin Muhammad said this team doesn't seem to recover from one bad play on the road, like the blocked punt yesterday and the sack/fumble against Minnesota. Your thoughts on that?

I don't know that that's true, you'll have to ask Moose. We had some bad plays against Chicago and we were down 17-3 in the third quarter. But that one turned out a little different. Again, this isn't a history lesson because I like to keep it simple. I don't know that it's a real important trait at this point,or a substantial one.

Q. Do you have an idea of how many points you need each game to give you a good chance to win? Don Shula used to say 17.

More than three would be fair. (Seventeen) is usually on most goal charts. I'm not a real stat guy, other than the W and the L. So I'm sure it's somewhere on the board offensively. But I know it's more than three and 10. But sometimes those are enough. I've been in them.

Q. Why did you use Mark Jones as a kick returner after Jonathan Stewart returned the first one?

For an instant...Jonathan got hit hard. That's part of the game, but I don't think he was ready for the next one. As we went on I think Mark did a real good job and we left him in there. We've relied on him all season (on punt returns) and he just hasn't had a lot of reps. So we spread the wealth a little and felt comfortable enough to stay with him. We'll evaluate it and it'll be a game-time decision (for next week).

Q. Was Stewart hit pretty hard?

I know it got his attention. But we didn't (change) because we were trying to protect him. He got a little dazed and wasn't ready for the next one. We kind of liked what we saw in Mark and stayed with him.

Q. You're undefeated at home and have two straight coming up here. Are you a confident team at home?

I don't spend a lot of time looking at our records on that road, or records at home. The reality is our focus is on performing well against the Saints, it's a division game. What happened yesterday and what happens tomorrow, we'll plan for what happens tomorrow and learn from what happened yesterday. It's kind of fun when they're cheering for you, rather than booing. But at the end of the day, you have to perform.

Q. Were the Bucs daring you to throw by stacking 8 men on the line of scrimmage?

We didn't run well whether there was 8 or 7. We didn't execute in the run game nearly as well as we have or needed to.

Q. Do you have a sense of the status of Jeff Otah and Ryan Kalil for Sunday?

They're both day to day.

Q. Jeff practiced late in the week, was there something that happened to worsen the injury?

We wanted to see if he was ready and we deemed he wasn't.

Q. What specifically happened on the blocked punt?

It was a mistake by our left side and the protection failed.

Q. Who makes the protection call?

Our personal protector. The call was fine, but we we had two guys not be on the same page. I'm not going to mention their names, you know that, but that's what happened.

Q. How do you coach when adversity hits during a game?

They have to go on to the next play. You have to have a short memory and have to get on to the next play. I dont' think we've been 100 percent around here, won a lot of games around here, as far as falling apart every time something bad happens. I don't agree with that notion. Sometimes they're harder to recover from. You can't spot a good football team 14 points like yesterday, it changes the way they play the rest of the game and it's a hard thing to ovecome against good football teams. We didn't deal with it mentally. It was 14 points and that's not easy to overcome for any football team, not just ours.

Q. Do players have a trait that helps them push through situations like that?

You see during the season, we won 2 games, lost one, then came back and won 2 and lost one. Losing those games is adversity. I don't think our guys are any stranger to adversity if that's what you're insinuating. I don't feel like in games, when theings go bad, our guys crawl up in a hole somewhere. I don't think we've done that. We had an interception on a third down that we scored on but had a penalty call it back and it was a first down (against Kansas City). We came back. That's adversity. That's what football is. You're dealing with both of those, dealing with adversity as well as prosperity. Sometimes prosperity is hard to deal with.

Q. Do you sense a change on the sideline when things turn like that?

They did against Chicago, they did against Atlanta. We had a blocked punt in that game, too. I thought we rebounded from that pretty good. It happens every game. I don't know your point. We deal with it every game.

Posted by Observer Sports on October 13, 2008 at 01:59 PM | Permalink

Comments

Penalties, mental errors and special teams lapses all fall on one persons shoulders. THE COACH.

Fox - Thank you for your coy answers that lack any sort of detail. I can really see our team resemble your demeanor on the field. All of your enthusiasm, passion and vigor to coach really shows up on Sundays', so from all of us, Thanks again.


Posted by: john | Oct 13, 2008 2:09:26 PM

Now that the dust has settled somewhat from yesterday. I think Tampa Bay has several things to have a chip on their shoulder. Last year Tampa Bay was playing in Charlotte and their premier running back Carnell Williams was injured and there are doubts he will ever fully recover. Two or three year ago the Panthers were playing in Tampa Bay and Chris Sims was injured and he has never returned to be a starter. After yesterday payback is over. The good thing is the Panthers get the chance to play Tampa Bay again on their turf. It could be the stakes will be much higher next time around.

Posted by: Mike | Oct 13, 2008 2:19:14 PM

Yes, John. You're ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. When players don't fulfill the assignments they've been given, that's the coaching staff's fault. PLEASE. If Rosario doesn't skip off down the field like an idiot, we'd have been fine. But hey, go ahead and throw the headset on. I'm sure you'll take us to the NFC Championship THREE TIMES if Fox & Co. have done it twice, huh?

Posted by: Michael Procton | Oct 13, 2008 2:20:21 PM

No one can say that Carolina does not have talent. The most prolific receiver in the game, Veteran leadership (Moose & Hoover), vast untapped potential (Jarrett, Rosario, King, Williams (RB)) and guys who go out and play hard nose week in\out, such as Harris, Beason, Smith and Lucas and even Gamble. As much as I am a JP fan, sometimes I don't know where he is. It's like sometimes he shows up and sometimes he's out to lunch. Panther fans are looking and vying for consistency. We can take a competitve loss but getting blown out by a sub-competitive team is demoralizing. Fox has to tap into the guys for consistency. The only thing we are consistent with is letting opposing teams block out punts and our offense jumping offsides! Those are mental mistakes. I would begin to fine each player who continue to kill us with those mental lapses. Penalties are killing us along with our attention to detail. Fox has to focus his staff and players or else we are looking at another subpar season with a team loaded with talent.

Posted by: Sam Davis | Oct 13, 2008 2:30:36 PM

Typical John Fox interview. No emotion, no details, seemingly no interest in what's going on. I, along with many others, have seen it this season (even when we win)... the main thing this team is lacking is a solid coach(ing staff).

Foxy is too conservative and his insistence of being a running team is making us unbelievably one-dimensional. Add that to the fact that my little sister can call his next move on each down... its just time for him to hit the road. I know its early in the season... but if we miss the playoffs this year, I'd be willing to bet that Foxy is sent packing.

Posted by: A dude | Oct 13, 2008 2:36:54 PM

So when everyone on the whole football team goes out onto the field and lays a huge epic egg it all returns to the shoulders of John Fox? I think that's being terribly unfair to him.

Everyone went out there and played bad. If you want to establish blame, you blame the whole football team for deciding to suck that day. Don't run out there and bash on John Fox for taking a no-name team and turning it around in two season and making the Superbowl.

John Fox knows what he's doing. We're a two dimensional football team now after drafting Stewie and repairing our O-Line. We can run the ball and throw it down the field. That's something that Sean Peyton cannot claim. If we can stop their west coast offense, then Reggie Bush will not be able to save his team.

Posted by: Revshawn | Oct 13, 2008 2:58:23 PM

Dude, was it so wrong with Fox wanting to establish the run, especially against this Tampa team, you saw the results when Jake was forced to drop back and pass most of the game.

Posted by: matt | Oct 13, 2008 2:58:39 PM

"Sub-competitive?" What the hell are you talking about, Sam? We've been beaten this year by teams that are 4-2 and 3-3. Hardly "sub-competitive" in my book.

We need a healthy o-line back on the field so the run works, and we need ALL our receivers to catch the balls that hit them in the hands. Jake was left TOTALLY out to dry on more than a handful of occasions. And yes, everybody's favorite disappearing act, Julius Peppers, was again nowhere to be seen. Was it the scheme this week? Did he go into coverage too much? Or was he quadruple-teamed by the Bucs' line? Maybe this can be the week his fanboys admit he just doesn't try.

Posted by: Michael Procton | Oct 13, 2008 3:12:25 PM

Have you ever noticed that Foxy says alot, but really doesn't say anything?

Posted by: bill | Oct 13, 2008 3:18:42 PM

FYI Pittsburgh Steelrs punter Chris Gardocki never had any of his 1,177 punts blocked. that's 16 years!! we've had 3 in 6 games. That's coaching. Junior high school kids know to always protect inside gap (no matter what the "modern" protection "count" is) tampa rushed one guy outside and both a player and Rosario stepped out while Tampa man ran inside gap of rosario. This is POOR coaching and a poor excuse by Fox about different players, you only have 53 and everyone of them should know to protect inside gap on kicks no matter how fancy our modern blocking schemes are - ain't modern if you get 3 blcoked!!! Plus, Baker does need to speed his catch to kick up as well.
FIRE GROSSMAN PPPPLLLEEEAASSEEEE
lastly, 2 tight ends and two backs = 8 to 9 in the box versus a tampa 2 scheme. 3 wides and two bck equates to 6 in box versus 5 lineman and one fb - it ain't rocket science, if you want to run, spread the field and give our guys some gaps, this is simple math and came into run schemes heavily in the 80's. That si also why "wildcat" or old single wing works, instead of 10 on 11 with QB handing ball off, you have 11 on 11 or extra run block support. Again, it's just math.

Posted by: Isaiah | Oct 13, 2008 3:20:04 PM

Oh, my... This is why my guys are dubbed The Cardiac Cats. Now,since our hearts are beating out of our chests, lets BEAT the rest of the boogers on the list. Drew and Reggie... We do best when it seems tough.
And then the red-headed birds... Red heads are flakey, especially when away from home. And then a bye week. And then two High School teams, The Raiders of Oakland High and the Lions of Detroit West High school. By then, Jake should be able to figure out where/how to throw the pigskin so that the delicate-digited felines can capture it without breaking a nail.

Posted by: KKMartin | Oct 13, 2008 3:26:02 PM

I want to run as much as anybody but we have to mix it up. We ran almost every first down until it was too late. I used to blame Dan Henning and I hate to say this but Fox must institute better play calling where we can keep a tough defense on their toes or Fox needs to go.

Posted by: Greg | Oct 13, 2008 3:27:07 PM

Everyone knows this is a make or break year for Fox & Co. as he can no longer live on success from 3-5 years ago (procton). Injuries? every team has them, no excuse. It's mostly demoralizing the way we lose. Emotionless, passionless, and without any sense of urgency. That is a direct reflection on the head coach. You can look to Danny Crossman or Davidson but Fox is in charge of all those guys so blown coverage, penalties, etc. all falls back to him and his make or break season. I'm pulling for him, and I hope I'm wrong but his attitude and inability to answer interview questions are both beginning to rub Charlotte the wrong way.


Posted by: john | Oct 13, 2008 3:28:49 PM

Mike, you have to work with me and understand that when I say sub-competitive, I should've stated "Teams we should have beaten" Minnesota and Tampa Bay are good teams but we have a better team. How can you justify losing to Minnesota. My main point was "INCOSISTENCY"

We are inconsistent. Sometimes the boys will show up and other times, they are out in left field playing hockey with Sarah Palin! C'mon. Mental errors are killing us.

If I were Sean Payton, I would be analyzing the special teams, and configuring a plan to capitalize on our punt team. Yes, I know these guys are professional athletes but they have to know what it takes for them to be prepared. Why aren't they better prepared? Can you say........Coaching!

Mike, there is no way with the talent we have should we be 4-2. We should at least be 5-1. We beat teams were not supposed to beat and lose to teams we are supposed to beat. That's crazy! Where is the consistency! Give me consistency and I will go down swinging with ya everytime! I would rather have someone who would show up in a alley and fight with me that for them to show up and watch me get my (*& kicked. CONSISTENCY IS THE KEY!

Posted by: Sam | Oct 13, 2008 3:28:57 PM

Fire John Fox, FOX gotta go please!!!!

Posted by: Naija boi | Oct 13, 2008 3:29:03 PM

Just a side note: my friend just asked me why my boyfriend, Dave, broke up with me. I said, "I didn't execute." You can think about that one.

Posted by: KKMartin | Oct 13, 2008 3:34:38 PM

KK, That is too funny! But it makes one think.

Posted by: Sam | Oct 13, 2008 3:40:58 PM

I very much enjoyed your diatribe, Sam!

Posted by: KKMartin | Oct 13, 2008 3:53:52 PM

I think this blowout was a wakeup to this team (and the fans) maybe it will keep everyone grounded.

But the funniest thing is all these people who are quiet as a mouse on the Mondays following the 4 wins but appear on the 2 days following a loss calling for heads to roll.

Posted by: matt | Oct 13, 2008 3:54:42 PM

Indeed, Matt

Posted by: KKMartin | Oct 13, 2008 3:58:49 PM

actually most of us have been calling for Grossman's head for several years now as our special teams are amongt the leaque's worst for several years now. Return game ahs not been good. Coverage teams stink. Even this year, when you take away the touchbacks from lloyd, our coverage has not been great and is getting steadily worse. Now with 3 blcoed punts in 6 games we look like an overclassed H.S. jv team when punting. It's unacceptable on pro level win or lose, it's not like these guys are in school all day, working at Shoney's after practice, this is their full time job.

Posted by: isaiah | Oct 13, 2008 4:14:05 PM

The heck with Fox, fire Delhomme!

Posted by: julia | Oct 13, 2008 4:18:11 PM

Oh I definately agree about Crossman and the special teams, you get no argument from me.

Posted by: matt | Oct 13, 2008 4:22:50 PM

I agree about Crossman about the Special Teams. 3 blocked punts this early in the season is unacceptable.

Posted by: Revshawn | Oct 13, 2008 4:33:28 PM

This is why you are known as the Carolina Pansys. You loose one game and start crying like a child who can not have it's way. You are 4-2, quit crying over spilled milk. Now, if it were 2-4 then you would have a reason. And you also wonder why the media or other team fans don't give you respect....I would just say look at all the posts since the loss. You know what is pathetic...your loyalty and support. LMAO. Bring the Panthers to an area that doesn't have a team and they will be supported more than here. LOSERS!

Posted by: bystander | Oct 13, 2008 5:03:48 PM

Post a comment






Advertisements